In this post, we will discuss why the AV1611 is far superior to the so-called "original" Greek and Hebrew manuscripts.
The only Church Age in history that was never told to repent is the Church Age of the Reformation. Which is the Church Age which had the KJV and Martin Luther's Bible. This is what God says to the Reformation Church Age which spans from 1500-1900 in Revelation
I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.
Notice God says this Church Age has kept his word which was never said of any other Church Age. Much more is said about this Church Age which clearly lines it up with 1500-1900 however that is not the purpose of this article and I will discuss it sometime in the future.
Many Christians today love to boast about their knowledge of Greek and Hebrew and go back to the "originals" when there is no such thing as "originals". There is not a single manuscript on the face of this earth which is an "original". The so-called "originals" were written in 3 dead languages Paleo Hebrew, Aramaic and Koine Greek.
God says he would preserve his word and so any Bible Believing Christian would trust that God is NOT a liar and he has preserved his word
6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Nothing more really needs to be said, if you believe your Bible then you would believe God preserves his word. One man may say "well, he means he is just preserving his word in general. Nope, let's go to Proverbs now to debunk this
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
Does the verse say "Only a few words of God are pure?" No, it does not. Does it says "Every word of God in the original Greek and Hebrew are pure"? Definitely not! You see all you need to do is believe what your Bible says and you would know that God has preserved a perfect Bible for us to read. The reason people reject this notion is that they reject God's word.
The corrupt manuscripts used for modern Bibles come from the Alexandrian Manuscript line which was produced in Egypt. Egypt is one of the most corrupt places on the face of the earth and anyone that puts their trust in these people is an idiot.
Whereas the King James Bible comes from the Majority text which makes up 80% to 99% of the Greek Manuscripts and was produced in Antioch where the Church was founded! Oh, but let's trust in 1 to 19% of manuscripts in Egypt? Is this logical? No, it is not.
If the so-called "originals" were superior to the KJV then why is it they were never collated into a book together? You wanna know some facts about the Holy KJV Bible. It has 66 chapters in the book of Isaiah and there are 66 books in the KJV. The 66 Chapters of Isaiah correlate perfectly with the 66 Books of the Bible.
In Isaiah Chapter 40 we have Isaiah making a prophecy about the coming of John the Baptist
The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
John the Baptist then appears in the 40th book of the Bible
For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
If you think this is a coincidence you are a fool. This "coincidence" never occurs in the so-called "Originals" as they were never made into a book together. This also does not occur in the Catholic Bible as they have 72 books in their canon.
Moreover, in the 66th Chapter of Isaiah, we have the New heavens and earth which appear in the 66th book of the Bible (Revelation)
For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Too many coincidences ain't it? It's because they aren't coincidences. The so-called "originals" also never had any verse or chapter markings. Yet, through a study of the verses and Chapters, one truly finds that God inspired them.
-in John 6:66 we have the disciples deserting Jesus.
-Judas Iscariot has 13 letters in English.
-He is mentioned in John 13:13
-The Curse of the law is in Gal 3:13
-You are delivered from the curse of the law in Acts 13:39 (39 being 3 times 13)
-The number 666 occurs in Ezra 2:13, Rev. 13:18 (3 times 6) and 2 Chron. 9:13-
-There are 39 books in the OT in the KJV (3 times 13) and the last word in the KJV is "Curse". Explaining that the OT Law is a curse to mankind.
-Something I found in my personal study is the word "sinner" is first mentioned in Gen. 13:13 and speaks of the sodomites.
-I also found that in Exodus 20:8 (28 being 4 times 7) we have the 4th Commandment given which is to keep the Sabbath (which is the 7th day)
Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
10 in the KJV is the number of the Gentiles
-In Genesis 10 you have the first Gentile Kingdom.
-Acts 10 you have the opening of the door to the Gentiles.
-John 10 is the sheep of the "other fold"
-The missionary call and message to the Gentiles are found in Romans 10.
-In Revelation 10 the Lord puts his foot on the earth and takes possession of the Gentile kingdoms.
If you would like to know more about Bible Numerics I suggest you obtain a copy of Peter Ruckman's book "Bible Numerics" which is where I got the majority of this information.
None of the above verses and chapter markings can apply to the so-called "originals". Even if you did have the "originals" technically they would not be original as much of Proverbs were copied out and NOT original
These are also proverbs of Solomon, which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied out.
Christians do NOT need to go back to the original Greek and Hebrew as they have a perfectly preserved word of God easily available to them and to deny this is to deny scripture Ps. 12:6-7, Prov. 30:5 etc.